Sunday, December 6, 2015

Film Critique

Edward Jolley
Professor Bomboy
Humanities 101
6 September 2015
Critique of Hook
I’ve decided to use the film Hook, directed by Steven Spielberg in 1991, featuring a very extraordinary array of music composed by John Williams. I will critique this film covering two major aspects, which are the underlying plot meanings and the original music which accentuate the film’s most important scenes to make them more memorable. Also, I will cover areas of cinematography associated with the film.
The plot is straightforward but there is much you can miss, especially if you’re a child. The protagonist and lawyer “Peter Banning” suffers from the kidnapping of his two children, Jack and Maggie, by a pirate Captain named Hook, who is from a fairy tale place called Never-land. Upon arrival, Peter is accused of actually being “Peter Pan” by the antagonist Captain Hook. Peter forms an old alliance and slowly recovers his past which was clouded in a special type of “amnesia”. He must find a way to face his enemy, save his children, change his morals, and sort out his priorities before its too late.
Primarily I believe this film was created for entertainment directed towards children, though it includes noticeable dark parts that are often overlooked within the film. There is another reason for its creation which I did not even recognize or fully understand until I became an adult. The movie displays an array of life lessons of morality, trust, and priorities, while also tuning into darker notions of greed, selfishness and depression. This movie can cater to children on one level and at the same time adults on a higher one, thus falling into a family film genre.
            There are real life emotional pain and situations in this movie that the child audience would never understand, which gives the film an aura of realism. The protagonist Peter displays an obsession with success, irritability, and alcoholism, which leads to a disconnection from his wife and children. Adult viewers can relate to these issues and have a better association with the darker tones which a child could never begin to understand. Instead, children mainly just focus on watching adventurous fight scenes, comedy mischief, and constant entertainment provided by peer child actors. The antagonist Captain Hook suffers from distinct aspects of a midlife crisis involving anxiety, depression, and suicidal tendencies.
Aside from the adult outlooks, there are lessons and experiences that kids can relate to also. Peter’s children, Jack and Maggie, love their father but suffer from broken promises and lack of attention they so much crave. Many children viewers will understand these sorts of adaptations and will become more intrigued to see how the story plays out. Basically, there is a presence of happiness with an underlying hidden depression which children can loosely but not fully understand.
If you enjoyed the scores from movies like Star wars, Jurassic park, Indiana Jones, Jaws, Super Man, E.T., and Harry Potter, then you are going to be very interested in Hook’s pieces because they are all created by the same composer John Williams. I can’t stress enough the fact that the music essentially molds the film into a work of art. John Williams composes each individual piece and applies it to specific scenes to enhance the overall quality of the film. A great example is the scene which the war between good vs evil breaks out and the piece used entitled “the Ultimate War” is playing throughout climax of the film.  It’s a masterpiece in itself how the song mixes an upbeat adventurous tone to represent the “good side” but within the film’s scene there is nuisances complimenting the “evil side”, all the while matching on key with the specific parts of the scenes. In further detail, parts of the war that show peter flying it will there are many small fast paces notes followed up by a long drawn out one to give the feeling of motion and drive.
My favorite aspect of the music I will mention last. It’s the theme for Captain Hook. The score is “sinister and unpredictable” (Budke). To explain, the piece is constantly jumping back and forth between multiple instruments, mostly string and woodwind. The theme is so significant and memorable that I recognized it instantly after not viewing the movie for almost 10 years.
To give a better sense of this film’s depth, I find it necessary to discuss its cinematography.  A very significant camera shot used in this film is the long-shot or establishing shot, which is implemented upon Peter’s arrival to Never-land. The shot begins with a small hole displaying a clock and extends to reveal Never-land which “establishes” this unforgettable setting. The close-up shot can be seen upon the first appearance of Captain Hook. What feels unique when the director used this technique in the film’s first scene of the villain is that the first close-up of the Captain is on the actual “Hooked Hand” then transitions to Hook’s face showing only his countenance of confidence.
Camera angle techniques are widely used to show the relationship between characters or setting aspects. The low-angle technique as well as the high-angle technique is used simultaneously immediately after Pan’s return flight, which displays a sense of dominance being overhead looking down on the rest of the characters who are reaching up towards him as well as their point of view looking up as he sours across the environment.
Overall, the film reaches out and connects with people of all ages in different ways where as its possible for two different viewers to see a “different film” depending on their perception. It contains a fantastic array of music, created by a very famous and talented composer that enhances many scenes of the film.  The cinematography used has key elements that are memorable and interesting to keep the viewer entertained until the end. Whether a critic believes this film is good or bad, it’s still worth watching at least once.










           









Works Cited
Budke, Katelyn. “Hook: Film Score Analysis.” Prezi.com. Prezi Inc., 4 Apr. 2014. Web. 6 Dec. 2015.




Sunday, November 1, 2015

Narrative Art Critique

Edward Jolley
Professor Bomboy
Humanities 101
1 November 2015
Narrative Art Critique
Narrative art is unique in the way that it’s not just a plain static image but actually reveals a story to the viewer. My example of this will be a known classic, Washington Crossing the Delaware”. This oil canvas painting was created in the year 1851 by the Artist Emanuel Leutze and is now displayed in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. This painting contains many elements and principles of art that give it a rich and detailed atmosphere. The painting reenacts the famous event of George Washington crossing the Delaware River with his Continental troops which appeals to the viewer’s imagination and emotions while also capturing a cultural and historic moment.
This piece of narrative art captures a historical event that happened December 25th in 1776. General George Washington, at the time of the American Revolution, crossed the Delaware River with “5,400 troops hoping to surprise a Hessian force celebrating Christmas at their winter quarters in Trenton, New Jersey.”(Washington Crosses) The accompanying story, along with the fine details of the painting, helps one to grasp the emotion that Washington or the soldiers might have been feeling at that moment. I try to imagine early morning, rowing across a half frozen river while preparing for battle. I think the artist was trying to accomplish a sense of heroics and apprehension at the same time.
When critiquing this painting I found myself using a Marxist critical viewpoint. General George Washington is displaying a very powerful presence among his troops which is displayed in numerous ways. Washington is equipped with his military uniform, saber, tricorn hat, showing that is he a great military leader and warrior. Also he “holds a brass telescope symbolizing his visionary leadership”. (Emanuel) While the rest of the troops are manning the rowboats and preparing for the battle, Washington has his leg up with his gaze upon the upcoming battle that awaits him. To accentuate his presence of power, a “not yet created” American flag design follows behind him to add an overkill of supremacy to this painting.
“Washington crossing the Delaware” is filled of elements of art. I’ve analyzed some of the most prominent. The first element I noticed was the value of color, particularly the intensity, in the morning sunlight. It almost solely surrounds Washington and the American flag in a way that forces the viewer to draw their eyes to the main aspects of the historical event. (Explore) Next, I would like to examine the element of form. On the boat, both men with oars have their faces painted with light and shadow. Even though the painting is of course flat, the painter used this technique of “light and shadow to give them a three-dimensional form.”(Explore) Another element worth mentioning is that of depth. The perspective of the boats used in this painting gives a flat surface the illusion that the larger boat, carrying Washington, is closer to the viewer and makes you feel that the painting has a sense of depth.
Along with elements, there are also many principles of art included in this piece. Proportion is a very important feature in this painting. The most interesting use of proportion found is that of the boat. In comparison to the men, the boat is smaller in contrast. “Leutze exaggerates proportion to build up our emotion toward the painting and the event it represents”. (Explore). This is done so the viewer can focus on the physical struggle the troops endured when crossing the river. Another very strong principle is the artist’s use of movement. The water is splashing up against the boat while the rest of the river contains numerous small waves. Movement that isn’t as noticeable can be found within the troops who are using the oars. They are placed in different positions to show a struggle against the waters to keep their boat on their desired course.
Emanuel Leutze was inspired to create such a work of art due to his “strong belief in liberal democracy.”(Explore) In response to German politics, Leutze created this painting to motivate German reformers. The artist did a great job in capturing that patriotic essence that many proud Americans are determined to represent for their Country. The accuracy of the painting in relation to the actual event does present some imprecise details but overall his vision of a proud fight for liberty was evident in the end. The larger version was shipped to the United States in 1851 and “became an instant success with more than fifty thousand people coming to see it.
Overall I believe the painting presents a very interesting story with important historical background and at the same time being beautiful in itself. The use of elements and principles of art really bring the flat painting to life by giving it a wide array of depth and perception.  For you to truly understand what an original piece of art this is, you must have knowledge of its background. I like to think there isn’t any American who hasn’t seen this painting or recall this occurrence. My Marxist viewpoint involving the painting’s display of power wasn’t hard to decipher considering the painting depicting such a famous event in American culture. If you take all the aspects which I’ve covered along with the historical event, there shouldn’t be much debate on why this is one of the most famous and recognizable paintings in American History.






           









Works Cited
“Emanuel Leutze’s Symbolic Scene.” Edsitement.neh.gov. The Metropolitan Museum of Art., n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2015.
“Washington crosses the Delaware.” History.com. A&E Television Networks, LLC., n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2015.
“Explore and Learn.” Metmuseum.org. The Metropolitan Museum of Art., n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2015.






Sunday, October 4, 2015

Non-Western Art Critique

Edward Jolley
Professor Bomboy
Humanities 101
4 October 2015
Non-Western Art Critique
            There are many differences between Western and Non-Western art. These significant aspects that set them apart are, for example, the use of materials, aesthetics, cultural variances, philosophical concepts, and religious views.  The piece I chose is known as “Gan Ku Tiger”, which is a hanging scroll painting that was created by Gan Ku during the Edo Period of Japan around AD 1784-1796. The scroll, which is made of silk, has numerous examples of many of the elements and principles of art. Gan Ku Tiger was influenced by the “Nagasaki style”, which is highly decorative and popular among rich clients. I have always been a fan of tigers so I personally think this piece is quite beautiful and stays faithful to the Asian culture. The scroll is authentic and is a perfect example of Non-Western Art.
            Tigers were very popular in art during the Edo Period of Japan and this genuine painting expresses its beauty. The Gan Ku Tiger’s artist Utanosuke Gan Ku had quite an imagination when creating this tiger painting due to the fact that “the artists would never have seen a real tiger, they must have worked from skins” (“Gan Ku Tiger”). This particular piece is one of the most important of the British Museum where the scroll is kept. Tigers are also popular among my interests because they are my favorite animal. This animal gives art a powerful and mysterious aspect and I can understand why they were so popular during this time in Japan. The silk tiger scroll’s signature is authenticated and after being verified by the Museum officials, the conservation team then makes the decision to maintain the piece.
The element of arts, which are the visual components or building blocks that work together to create a larger structure can be found throughout the Gun Ku Tiger painting. The very first element that caught my eye and led me to choose the painting was the use of line. Not so much as in the more bulky strokes on the rocks of the cliff but the finer more distinct lines of the tiger’s pelt and even more the actual whiskers. Stripes are the tiger’s most significant attribute and this surely leads to the artist’s careful portrayal of them on the scroll.
            Texture is probably the biggest element of this painting. I’ve noticed that through viewing the painting as a simple picture online or in a book there is hidden detail that I could only uncover through watching a conservation video of the painting on the British Museum website. The High Definition video pans across the painting and reveals detail that was never before seen within the pictures. The brush strokes of the tiger’s fur are textured to replicate strands of fur. The detail is so fine that it makes you believe if you would to brush your hand across the painting, you would actually feel each raised strand of fur on the tiger’s pelt.
            Another significant element I found used well is that of space, which when increased or decreased around the focus of the art, it can change how we view what we are looking at. The tiger is shown on the small edge of a cliff. There minimal amount of space for the tiger to stand makes us view the animal as being exceeding nimble and agile as he climbs across the treacherous terrain. It’s a very remarkable technique to show the qualities of what the art represents to the viewer.
            The principles of art are used to organize the elements within art and contribute greatly to the final interpretation of the piece. The most significant principle that I personally noticed was that of Emphasis, particularly the contrast of the warm color of the tiger onto the cool colors of the grass and water. The viewers’ attention is immediately drawn to the orange tiger climbing across the cliff’s green grass and blue water.
            A more subtle principle in this artwork is the unity which it represents. The tiger seems to be crawling across the landscaping which makes the wild animal and nature come together in appropriate coordination. There is a very strong sense of balance and harmony as everything seems to be fitted together in a natural way across the scroll. There are also similarities in the features of the roaring water and the intense appearance of the tiger which match appropriately.
            I find the principle of proportion in the painting very interesting. If a person who didn’t know anything about the physical characteristics of a tiger would observe this scroll painting, they would most likely believe that the tiger’s size might be exaggerated to give the animal a more fearsome demeanor. The truth is that the proportion is very accurate. The tiger’s “powerfully hunched shoulders, the placing of its feet and the tip of the tail, just visible, which all emphasize the animal’s size and strength” is very accurate. The tiger is the largest natural occurring cat in the world.
            This Japanese scroll painting “Tiger” by Gan Ku contains many qualities of elements and principles of art. It’s very classy and a delight to look at. The fact that this accurate painting was created by most likely nothing but a pelt gives the entire piece of art an alluring disposition. Considering all the design elements involved, specifically the use of line and contrast, there is no doubt why it’s one of the most valued pieces displayed in the British Museum. The way the painting was completed on a silk scroll really gives the painting a classic Asian style that is easily distinguishable from Western Art.

“Tiger” by Gan Ku, Edo Period of Japan around AD 1784-1796













Works Cited

“Gan Ku, Tiger, a hanging scroll painting.” Britishmuseum.org. Trustees of the British Museum, n.d. Web. 4 Oct. 2015.

Sunday, September 13, 2015

Classical Architecture Critique

Edward Jolley
Professor Bomboy
Humanities 101
13 September 2015
Classical Architecture Critique
            The New York Court of Appeals Building in Albany, New York, has distinct features and design that displays aspects of the Classical Architecture style. The building was completed in the year 1842 by Architect Henry Rector.  The building can be categorized as a Greek revival, and contains characteristics as such. The design was highly inspired by Greek architecture, specifically the Greek Temple of Athena Nike. This structure is based on the Ionic Order, which is known to be slender and more elegant.  The New York Court of Appeals Building is living proof of the Classical Architecture style for many reasons.
            The Classical Order that the Court of Appeals building adheres to is the Ionic Order. This style tends to be more decorative than Doric but less than Corinthian. The main features that the Court of Appeals has acquired from this style consist of Volutes found in the capital of the column, which are “scrolls” above the shaft, giving it a more refined appearance. Then there are the flutes, which are carved lines on the columns from top to bottom of each of the six columns. Also, the bases of the columns appear to be sitting on a design that “look like a set of stacked rings” (“Charlotte-Mecklenberg”). The buildings entablature that rests on top of the columns contains the Architrave, frieze, and the top cornice. Each order contains these concepts but this specific Ionic order detail used on the building shows that “the architrave has an upper and lower fascia” (“The Ionic Entablature”).
New York’s Court of Appeals building is a Greek revival, which is an example of a popular “style that gained popularity by exploring parallels between an earlier culture and the present day” (“Historic Styles/Greek Rival”). The crown of the roof is exaggerated to give the building a more of a temple style aspect. This gives the court building a much more authoritative appearance. Though in this style the columns can be sometimes square, the building keeps to the classical style of round. The entrance is composed of three sets of double wood finished doors that stay true to the elaborate finish typically tied to the Greek revival. Also, the windows on the building are all double hung, except the ones beneath the cornice which are commonly small rectangular single pane. It’s a common scheme “that the window surrounds tended to be less elaborate than doorways” (“Historic Styles/Greek Rival”). This trait can be seen if you closely examine the front of the building.
            Inspiration from Greek Architecture can easily be linked between the New York Court of Appeals Building and other original Greek structures. Interesting enough is the fact that the building was highly inspired by the Temple of Athena Nike, built around 420BC and located on the Acropolis of Athens in Greece. The Temple was designed by the architect Callicrates, “who was commissioned by the senate” to build the temple. (“Callicarates”).   There is a direct inspiration of this architect’s work found throughout the Court building. A great example is that “the capitals and bases of the five columns supporting the portico were copies of those of the ancient Greek Temple of Nike” (“Court of Appeals”). Another significant detail worth mentioning is that Callicrates was also one of the architects that designed the Parthenon, which is a former temple on the Acroplis built in 438BC, following in accordance to the Golden Ratio. This “Divine Proportion” can be recognized throughout the Court of Appeals building as well. It’s not a coincidence but a very important and popular aspect of much classical architecture.  
The classical features, Ionic designs, and subtle elements compliment the buildings usage as a court house. This is such an important aspect when considering that, like clothes, appearance gives people a judgement on what is inside the exterior. The white marble gives the building an impressive and costly appearance, which in turn leads one to believe that this public building is very important to the city. This court houses judges and represents law and order. Due to this fact, it’s only appropriate that the building should have proper symmetry to represent the classical meaning of “endurance and balance” (Fiero 114). This characteristic gives the building a very prominent and proud appearance which seems very fitting for the highest court in the state of New York. If the buildings design projects this image then it can be known that inside resides people of power including the “Chief Judge along with six associate judges” (“Court of Appeals Hall”).
Throughout much extensive research and comparisons, it is a fact that the New York Court of Appeals building was inspired by Classical Architecture. It’s the epitome of Greek revival using the Ionic Order. From the cornice to the base of the columns numerous details decorate the court building showing a parallel likeness to classical architecture. When Henry Rector designed the building, he did a fantastic job when attempting to create it in the resemblance of the Greek Temple Athena Nike. The project features of the building designs have been easily linked through the classical time period’s original architecture and their architects.  The Court building has a background that when recognized, truly shows the links and inspiration of classical architecture that helps create the entire image of what the building represents not only on the outside but as a whole.


Works Cited
 “Callicrates.” Britannica.com. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., n.d. Web. 13 Sep. 2015.
“Court of Appeals Hall.” Nycourts.gov. n.p., n.d. Web. 13 Sep. 2015.
 “Historic Styles/Greek Revival.” wentworthstudio.com. Wentworthstudio.com, n.d. Web. 13 Sep. 2015.
“Ionic.” Cmhpf.org. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission, n.d. Web. 13 Sep. 2015.
 “The Ionic Tablature.” Theclassicalorders.com. The Classical Orders.com, n.d. Web. 13 Sep. 2015.
Fiero, Gloria K. The Humanistic Tradition. 7th ed. Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. Print.